Oil & Gas Litigation Analysis

Reese Marketos Energy Law

Oil & Gas Litigation · Case Analysis
Joel Reese, Attorney

Home › Cases › Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Pipeline & Easement

Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

U.S. District Court, District of Columbia Not yet assigned active

Standing Rock Sioux Tribe filed suit in D.D.C. on October 11, 2026, challenging the Army Corps' May 2026 easement grant for Dakota Access Pipeline's Lake Oahe crossing, alleging the December 2025 final EIS inadequately analyzed spill risks to tribal drinking water intakes and treaty-protected water rights. The complaint seeks both rescission of the easement and invalidation of PHMSA's spill response plan approvals, threatening operational continuity for the 570,000 bpd crude pipeline serving Bakken production.

Analysis

Standing Rock Challenges Army Corps Easement for Dakota Access Lake Oahe Crossing on NEPA Spill Risk Grounds

Standing Rock Sioux Tribe filed suit in D.D.C. on October 11, 2026, challenging the Army Corps' May 2026 easement grant for Dakota Access Pipeline's Lake Oahe crossing, alleging the December 2025 final EIS inadequately analyzed spill risks to tribal drinking water intakes and treaty-protected water rights. The complaint seeks both rescission of the easement and invalidation of PHMSA's spill response plan approvals, threatening operational continuity for the 570,000 bpd crude pipeline serving Bakken production.

Joel Reese  |  Oct 12, 2026
Pipeline Easement NEPA Midstream Infrastructure Bakken Tribal Treaty Rights